jk1
Newbie

Karma: +1/-0
Posts: 5
|
 |
« on: 12 February, 2009, 14:56 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regeneguru
Hero Member
    
Karma: +5/-0
Posts: 434

|
 |
« Reply #4 on: 12 February, 2009, 16:55 » |
|
I hope you are right. But to put it in context, Denmark Hill for Camberwell or whatever is less accessible for many parts of Camberwell than Oval Tube or the Elephant & Castle. My instinct is that South Camberwell already has a relatively strong sense of identity, and that the main problem is that North Camberwell is not even acknowledged as an area to be considered for strategic purposes by the Camberwell campaigners who sit at high local political table.
I'd love to believe there was a campaign to re-open Camberwell Rail, but I've seen nothing from the people with the ears of power, and I am aware of their current focus, campaign literature and history. The 'Society is the engine of Denmark Hill lobbying, and for them old Camberwell Rail is on the "wrong side of the road".
Personally, Denmark Hill is practically Dulwich for the average Camberwellian (who is not a well-to-do commuter). So while I wish the people well who have benefited from this inclusion, I would hope for some honesty about its fringe status as a Camberwell location, in order not to handicap an attempt to re-open Camberwell Rail, as transport chiefs replied "but you can't have <i>two</i> stations!".
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Красота спасёт мир" - Dostoevskij
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|